USPTO serial 75466776
MOVIEPOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2480982Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2001
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOVIEPOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
1703 GA Heerhugowaard, NL
1703 GA Heerhugowaard, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Drangel
Jason M. Drangel Epstein Drangel Bazerman James, LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 820New York, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING ADULT ENTERTAINMENT WEBSITE SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |