USPTO serial 75466938
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pleasant Hill, CA
Pleasant Hill, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY C WILLIAMS
D ALEXANDER FLOUM LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY C WILLIAMS1850 MT DIABLO BLVD STE 340WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING JOB PLACEMENT, JOB SEARCH, AND JOB RECRUITMENT SERVICES ON AN INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 26, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |