USPTO serial 75467025
TIME SAFE SEEING IS BELIEVING PUT A LOCK ON THE CLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIME SAFE SEEING IS BELIEVING PUT A LOCK ON THE CLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLAYTON R JOHNSON
CLAYTON R JOHNSON LAW OFFICE OF CLAYTON R JOHNSON3121 DAKOTA AVEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Armstrong, Timothy D.
- Other trademarks owned by Armstrong, Timothy D.
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TIME SAFE SEEING IS BELIEVING PUT A LOCK ON THE CLOCK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |