USPTO serial 75467132
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY F VITTONE
ANTHONY F VITTONE MEZZULLO & MCCANDLISH1111 E MAIN ST STE 1500RICHMOND, VA 23218UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, foundation, face powder, concealer, makeup remover, lipstick, lip gloss, lip pencils, eyeshadow, eye makeup primer, eye liner, eye pencils, mascara, eye makeup remover, blush, eye brow pencils, eye brow powder, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, and nail polish remover; hair care products, namely, shampoo conditioner, hair spray, hair colouring preparations, gel, hair lighteners, lotions, mousse, pomades, rinses, hair straightening preparations and hair brighteners; skin and body care products, namely, creams, lotions, toners, cleansing creams, cleansing lotions, emollients, moisturizers, gels, tonics, texturizers, masks, eye cream, eye gels, eye lotions, non-medicated lip balm, lip cream, body scrubs, body lotion, body oil, body powder, body shampoo, and non-medicated bath salts; and nail care preparations, namely, nail buffing preparations creams, cuticle softeners, nail strengtheners, and nail hardeners | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |