Drawing for HEALTHY CHOICE HC

USPTO serial 75467189

HEALTHY CHOICE HC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEALTHY CHOICE HC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK STEPHENSON

MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamins; nutritional supplements; meal replacement beverages; meal replacement beverage mixesABANDONED—
029Frozen, refrigerated and/or prepared dinners, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of beef, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; seafood; fish fillets; fish steaks; fish portions; fish sticks; beef; beef cuts; pork; pork cuts; poultry; poultry cuts; poultry portions; soup; soup mixes; stew; chili; ground beef; ground pork; ground poultry; processed meats; lunch meats; frankfurters; non-dairy creamer; whipped toppings; cheese; sour cream; cream cheese; jam; jelly; peanut spread; fruit salads; vegetable salads; garden salads; potato salads; chicken salads; tuna salads; crab salads; imitation crab salads; salad oil; create-your-own salad kits and/or salad components consisting primarily of sliced, cubed, diced, shredded and/or cut ham, chicken, poultry, cheese, processed lettuce and/or vegetables; yogurt; fruit chips; potato chips; vegetable dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dipsABANDONED—
030Frozen, refrigerated and/or prepared dinners, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bread; breakfast cereal; oatmeal; sandwiches, namely, hamburgers, hotdogs and fish; pasta; pasta sauce; spaghetti sauce; tomato sauce; seafood sauce; salsa; tortilla chips; pizza; pudding; pre-cooked, ready-to-eat, frozen bread having a meat, cheese and/or vegetable filling; cookies; crackers; frozen dessert pies; frozen dessert cakes; frozen yogurt; ice cream; syrup topping for ice cream; pasta salads; pasta salads with vegetables; pasta salad with chicken; salad dressing; seasoned coating mixes for beef, pork, poultry and/or seafood; popped popcornABANDONED—
031Unpopped popcornABANDONED—
032fruit juices; vegetable juicesABANDONED—
035FOOD KIOSK SERVICESABANDONED—
042Cafe services; cafeteria services; restaurant servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 13, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Jul 27, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance