USPTO serial 75467891
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. Bell, Esq.
BRUCE E BELL SCHOENBERG FISHER NEWMAN & ROSENBERG222 S RIVERSIDE PLZ STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606-6101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Sample packs of consumer goods consisting primarily of dietary supplements, pain relief medications, acne medications, antacids, allergy medications, anti-inflammatories, antibiotic ointments, athlete's foot preparations, calamine lotion, cold sore treatment preparations, preparations for treating colds, cough drops, decongestants, eye drops, expectorants, hemorrhoid treatment preparations, medicated lip balm, medicated facial lotion, throat lozenges, pre-moistened medicated towelettes, dandruff shampoo and also featuring packaged health food products, all as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sample packs of consumer goods consisting primarily of packaged health food products, namely, wafers, crackers, wheatcakes, popped popcorn, pretzels, pastas and pasta products, cereal-derived food bars, tea, herbal tea, coffee, granola, gelatin, noodles, low-calorie cookies and cakes, seasonings, hot sauces, salsas, soy-based biscuits and cakes, carob products, pilaf rice, rice-based snack foods, bread mix, natural sweeteners, chocolate-covered and carob-coverd nuts, seasoned coatings for meat, fish and poultry, and also featuring dietary supplements and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, all as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EX5M | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EX5D | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |