Drawing for THE LEADER IN VENTLESS DEEP-FRYING TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75468079

THE LEADER IN VENTLESS DEEP-FRYING TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2293754Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 16, 1999
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE LEADER IN VENTLESS DEEP-FRYING TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley J. Walz

Bradley J. Walz Barnes & Thornburg, LLP225 South Sixth StreetSuite 2800Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Hoodless, ventless, commercial electric deep fat fryersSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 22, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 15, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2011CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2010RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 11, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 7, 2010E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 19, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 16, 2005ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 1999R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 7, 1999CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 1, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance