Drawing for SUPER LAUNDRY

USPTO serial 75468157

SUPER LAUNDRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER LAUNDRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOAN L. LONG

JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAWPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail distributorship featuring laundry equipmentACTIVE—
037Construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of laundry retail stores; maintenance and repair of laundromat equipmentACTIVENov 22, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 29, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 24, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 24, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance