Drawing for THE PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS

USPTO serial 75468205

THE PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIA A SAVIOR

MARIA A SAVIOR GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ELECTRIC COOLING UNITS FOR WATER IN COMMERCIAL USE AND DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS, COMPRISING SEDIMENT FILTER, REVERSE OSMOSIS FILTER, CHARCOAL FILTER , FOLDING TANK, FAUCET, CONSOLE AND CONNECTING PLUMBING; BOTTLED WATER VENDING MACHINES AND COOLERS; WATER PURITY ASSURANCE SAFETY SYSTEMS FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL , WATER DISTILLERS, WATER FILTRATION AND PURIFICATION UNITS AND REPLACEMENT, CARTRIDGES AND FILTERS THEREFORACTIVE—
021CUP DISPENSERS, DRINKING CUPS AND BOTTLED DRINKING WATER STANDSACTIVE—
032BOTTLED DRINKING WATERACTIVE—
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES CONSISTING OF VENDING MACHINES THAT DISPENSE DRINKING WATER, BOTTLED WATER, SETS; RETAIL OUTLETS AND TELEPHONE SALES SERVICES FEATURING WATER CONDITIONING APPARATUS AND DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS; CONDUCTING CONSUMER INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS IN THE BOTTLED WATER INDUSTRY FEATURING FREE BOTTLED WATER AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND DISCOUNT COUPONS TO PROMOTE THE USE OF BOTTLED WATERACTIVE—
037REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WATER CONDITIONING APPARATUS AND DRINKING WATER APPARATUSACTIVE—
039DELIVERY OF BOTTLED DRINKING WATERACTIVE—
040WATER TREATMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, FILTRATION AND CONDITIONING SERVICES FOR DOMESTIC DRINKING WATER SUPPLIESACTIVE—
042RENTAL OF DRINKING WATER EQUIPMENT, NAMELY COOLERS AND HOT AND COLD DISPENSING CONSOLES; WHOLESALE AND RETAIL DISTRIBUTION OF PACKAGED WATERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance