Drawing for HEAVY HITTERS

USPTO serial 75468354

HEAVY HITTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAVY HITTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAME M BAGARAZZI

JAME M BAGARAZZI DORITY & MANNING PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power driven heavy duty impact wrenches for professional mechanics in the automotive aftermarketACTIVEJul 20, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 13, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 21, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance