Drawing for MILLENNIUM SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75468369

MILLENNIUM SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY A SCHWAB

JEFFREY A SCHWAB ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for image processing applications; image processing systems composed of an automated digitizing unit providing information representative of an image of a document, a display, an input device and a computerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 1, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 6, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 28, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance