Drawing for M MECHANIX WEAR

USPTO serial 75468477

M MECHANIX WEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M MECHANIX WEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD S KOPPEL

RICHARD S KOPPEL KOPPEL & JACOBS555 ST CHARLES DR STE 107THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008tool apronsACTIVE—
009knee pads for workers, heat resistant sleeves for human wear, belts for carrying radiosACTIVE—
016dry erase writing boards, stickers, paper banners, decalsACTIVE—
018all purpose athletic bags, waist packs, umbrellasACTIVE—
020plastic bannersACTIVE—
025clothing, namely gloves, hats, sweatshirts, work shoesACTIVE—
027ground pads, namely, a foam plastic mat with a plastic outer shell to support a person while working on a vehicleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance