USPTO serial 75468546
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dania, FL
Dania, FL
Dania, FL
POMPANO BEACH, FL
POMPANO BEACH, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LLOYD G FARR
LLOYD G FARR Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP100 North Tryon Street42nd Floor, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |