Drawing for GREYSTONE'S AMERICAN HISTORY NETWORK

USPTO serial 75469266

GREYSTONE'S AMERICAN HISTORY NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWITZER, SANDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREYSTONE'S AMERICAN HISTORY NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID W GRACE

DAVID W GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLPSTE 220010100 SANTA MONICA BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4164

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO RECORDINGS IN THE FIELD OF HISTORYACTIVE—
041EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF HISTORYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 30, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 14, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance