Drawing for TIMPANO

USPTO serial 75469895

TIMPANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIMPANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHANNON T VALE

SHANNON T VALE FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Restaurant, bar, and catering servicesACTIVEJun 18, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance