USPTO serial 75470328
CEREMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CEREMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. RITTER
MICHAEL J RITTER RITTER, LANG & KAPLAN, LLP12930 SARATOGA AVE STE D1SARATOGA, CA 95070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the capture, storage, presentation, validation, authentication and transfer of documents, namely, documents evidencing contracts, deeds, title transfers, credit slips and other documents of payment, bailment and possession, licenses, wills, trusts, and negotiable instruments; computer software for the capture, storage, presentation, validation, authentication and transfer of signatures, voice prints, fingerprints, eye movements; computer code keys, such as personal identification numbers and public and private keys, and other indicia confirming the identity of the user | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |