Drawing for FILEFINDER

USPTO serial 75470334

FILEFINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILEFINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARSHA G GENTNER

MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT, PAPER RECORDS MANAGEMENT, AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL INVENTORY RECORDS MANAGEMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 30, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 9, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 17, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Jul 11, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 1, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 5, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance