USPTO serial 75470577
MAXIMA TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXIMA TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
East Petersburg, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J. Wolstoncroft
BRUCE J WOLSTONCROFT BARLEY SNYDER SENFT & COHEN LLC126 E KING STLANCASTER, PA 17602-2832UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | panel mounted gauges, namely, speedometer, tachometer, oil pressure, oil temperature, and water temperature gauges, panel gauge instrument clusters comprising speedometer, tachometer, oil pressure, oil temperature, and water temperature gauges, and electronic data sending units for speedometer, tachometer, oil pressure, oil temperature, and water temperature gauges, and electronic data senders that sense revolutions per minute, pressure, temperature, or fluid level and transmit electronic data in digital or analog signal to said gauges, said gauges, instrument clusters, and sender for direct sale to and for use by motorcycle manufacturers; engine propelled marine vehicles manufacturers; bus manufacturers; on-highway heavy duty truck manufacturers for use ; off highway engine propelled construction vehicles manufacturers; off-highway engine propelled agricultural vehicle manufacturers; off-highway engine propelled mining vehicle manufacturers; and lift truck manufacturers; golf cart manufacturers and personal transport carrier manufacturers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |