USPTO serial 75470579
SEAPHIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEAPHIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES F HAUFF JR
CHARLES F HAUFF JR SNELL & WILMER LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT1 AZ CTR 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-0001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and skin care products, namely, moisturizing and toning lotions and creams for the face, hands, and body; body washes; facial cleansers, scrubs, and masques; eye serums; non-medicated lip balms; and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Planetary Design Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SEAPHIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Planetary Design Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SEAPHIRE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |