Drawing for GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75470627

GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL S CULVER

MICHAEL S CULVER OLIFF & BERRIDGE PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, conducting career training programs in the cosmetology, business and allied health fieldsACTIVESep 7, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 4, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 4, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 1, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance