USPTO serial 75470750
SHO-BOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHO-BOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID TOREN
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Resin adhesives for repairing cracks in concrete structures, adhesives for use in the construction industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |