USPTO serial 75470971
DEAN'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2957396Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEAN'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DALLAS, TX
DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
Franklin Park, IL
DALLAS, TX
DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNN B. WISSER
Bridget G. Johnson Dean Foods CompanySuite 34002711 North Haskell AvenueDallas, TX 75204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces and pudding | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIPS LP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by DEAN FOODS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by DIPS LP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DEAN'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |