USPTO serial 75471153
THE BALANCE OF THE SMILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BALANCE OF THE SMILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
78110 Le Vesinet, FR
78110 Le Vesinet, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A CLIFFORD
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Based on Intent to Use Cosmetics, namely, lipstick, eyelid pencils, face powders, body powders, foundation cover creams, face moisturizing creams, skin moisturizing creams, make-up removers, blushers, glossy lipsticks, lip pencils, anti-aging creams, anti-wrinkle creams, facial lotions, cleaning milks, eye shadows, protective creams and pomades for lips | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Based on Intent to Use dental amalgams, dental abrasives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LECLERC, Jean-Francois
- Other trademarks owned by LECLERC, Jean-Francois
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named THE BALANCE OF THE SMILE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |