Drawing for SAGETALK

USPTO serial 75471407

SAGETALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAGETALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH DIAMANTE

JOSEPH DIAMANTE PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software delivered by means of global computer networks, CD-Roms and preloaded hard drives, providing an intermediary interface which enables the user to interact with software applications, personalizing to the characteristics of the user, and adapting to a history of the user's interactionsACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely brochures, books, printed instructional and educational teaching materials for use in connection with computer software providing a business and e-commerce intermediary interface which enables the user to interact with software applications, personalizing to the characteristics of the user, and adapting to a history of the user's interactionsACTIVE—
041media production services for animation, graphics video, recorded voice and written textACTIVE—
042computer software design and development services for design and development of computer software providing an intermediary interface which enables the user to interact with software applications, personalizing to the characteristics of the user, and adapting to a history of the user's interactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance