USPTO serial 75471537
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAN CLEVELAND, JR.
MURRAY SCHAFFER JASPAN SCHLESINGER HOFFMAN LLP300 GDN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | non-prescription dietary supplements | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |