Drawing for MOTHER NATURE'S HEALTH POPS

USPTO serial 75471837

MOTHER NATURE'S HEALTH POPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTHER NATURE'S HEALTH POPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK F HARRINGTON

MARK F HARRINGTON PERMAN & GREEN LLP425 POST RDFAIRFIELD, CT 06430-6232UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030herbal homeopathic health pops for the treatment of cough and cold; airborne allergies; smoker's withdrawal; premenstrual syndrome; and stress and anxietyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 19, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 12, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 20, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 2, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 1, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 7, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance