USPTO serial 75472245
POINTMERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POINTMERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R REEVES
CHARLES R REEVES WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET ALBANK 1 CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical system comprised primarily of computer hardware and software and related application tools and instruments and component parts therefore for initially positioning and then tracking patient position and the position of such tools and instruments used in image-guided surgery | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named POINTMERGE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |