USPTO serial 75472283
MACROFLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MACROFLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. BYRON MILLER
D BYRON MILLER ALZA CORP1900 CHARLESTON RD M10-3P O BOX 7210MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94039-7210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Transdermal patches for sampling glucose, sold without medication; transdermal drug patches sold with medication; iontophoretic drug delivery devices, namely, iontophoresis electrodes, iontophoresis dispersive pads, and iontophoresis apparatus which generates an electric current for the delivery of drugs through the skin, sold with medication; intradermal drug delivery devices sold with medication | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Iontophoretic drug delivery devices, namely, iotophoresis electrodes, iontophoresis dispersive pads, and iontophoresis apparatus which generates an electric current for the delivery of drugs through the skin, sold without medication; intradermal drug delivery devices sold without medication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |