USPTO serial 75472311
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Little & Associates Architects, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Other trademarks owned by Little & Associates Architects, Inc.
Little & Associates Architects, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Other trademarks owned by Little & Associates Architects, Inc.
LITTLE DIVERSIFIED ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING, INC.
CHARLOTTE, NC
Other trademarks owned by LITTLE DIVERSIFIED ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Bryner, Esq.
William M. Bryner, Esq. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1001 WEST FOURTH STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | real estate and asset management services; namely development and implementation of plans and systems for the optimal utilization of the real estate and assets of others and providing information regarding the foregoing services via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 29, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 26, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 29, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |