USPTO serial 75472632
KT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT COHEN
SUSAN B FLOHR BLANK ROME LLP600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWTHE WATERGATEWASHINGTON, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TEXTILE ARTICLES, NAMELY, HOME FURNISHINGS FOR BED, BATH AND KITCHEN, SHEETS, COMFORTERS, BLANKETS, BEDSPREADS, DRAPES, TOWELS; NAPERY, NAMELY, TABLECLOTHS, NAPKINS, PLACEMATS; BATHROOM TEXTILES, NAMELY, BATH MATS AND SHOWER CURTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, OUTERWEAR, NAMELY, OVERCOATS, RAIN COATS, TOP COATS, JACKETS, HATS, GLOVES, SHOES; FORMAL WEAR, NAMELY, TUXEDOES, EVENING JACKETS, EVENING GOWNS; BEACH WEAR, NAMELY, SWIMSUITS, ROMPERS, COVER-UPS; UNDERGARMENTS; LOUNGE WEAR, NAMELY, ROBES, DRESSING GOWNS, HOUSECOATS, PAJAMAS; SPORTSWEAR, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SOCKS, PANTS; NECKWEAR, NAMELY, TIES, SCARVES, CRAVATS; ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, HANDKERCHIEFS; DRESSES, JUMPERS, SUITS, SHIRTS, JEANS, SKIRTS, OVERALLS, BERMUDA SHORTS, SHORTS, VESTS, COATS, BLOUSES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |