Drawing for LOCATION ON DEMAND

USPTO serial 75472972

LOCATION ON DEMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOCATION ON DEMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LORI N BOATRIGHT

LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Global positioning computer system hardware and software for identifying the position and uses of a telecommunication deviceACTIVE
038Communications and telecommunications services using global positioning systems to provide navigation, positioning, and tracking for a user of a telecommunications deviceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 25, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 25, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 10, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Apr 12, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance