Drawing for Serial No. 75473440

USPTO serial 75473440

Serial No. 75473440

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75473440?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VALERIE W JOHNSON

SCOTT K HAIGHT BUTLER, SNOW, O'MARA, STEVENS & CANNADAP O BOX 171443MEMPHIS, TN 38187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames, blanket boxes of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum, or plasticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 1, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2003GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 8, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 5, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 21, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance