USPTO serial 75473546
RAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2955189Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica S. Verma
Monica S. Verma Baker & Hostetler LLP1900 East 9th Street3200 National City CenterCleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, dresses, skirts, shirts, blouses, pants, overalls, jackets, coats, vests, shorts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, swimsuits, headwear, socks, hosiery, pajamas, underwear, belts, scarves, ties, gloves, shoes, boots, sneakers, sandals and slippers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |