USPTO serial 75473917
NO LIMITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO LIMITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANTAS-GESTAO E INVESTIMENTOS LDA.
68 - Funchal (Madeira), PT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALESSANDRO SARACINO
ALESSANDRO SARACINO PAVIA & HARCOURT600 MADISON AVE BOX PTONEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | GOODS OF LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, NAMELY, TRUNKS, SUITCASES, HANDBAGS, PURSES, DUFFLE BAGS, SATCHELS AND KNAPSACKS, TRAVELING BAGS, RUCKSACKS, WAIST BAGS, VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY, WALLETS, UMBRELLAS, BEACH UMBRELLAS, WALKING STICKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, VESTS, PANTS, SUSPENDERS, SKIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, JACKETS, PULLOVERS, BELTS, MEN SHORTS, WOMEN SHORTS, BERMUDA SHORTS, POLO SHIRTS, LEGGINGS FOR MEN AND WOMEN, HOSIERY, SOCKS; CLOTHING FOR SPORTS ACTIVITIES, NAMELY, WOOL HEAD BANDS, BANDANAS, SCARVES, SWEAT SHIRTS AND PANTS MADE OF PILE, WORKER JACKETS, HOODED ANORAKS, SKI SUITS, TRACKSUITS, SKI PANTS AND JACKETS, WATER-SKI WET-SUITS, GLOVES, SKI GLOVES, SKI SOCKS, BALACLAVA HATS, OVERCOATS, LIGHT COATS, TRENCH COATS, RAINCOATS, STORM PANTS AND JACKETS, OVERALLS, SAFARI JACKETS, HATS MADE OF WOOL AND CAPS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS, SKI BOOTS, BEACH SHOES, TREKKING BOOTS, MOUNTAIN BOOTS, SLIPPERS, WATER SPORT SHOES, BOAT SHOES, RUBBER BOOTS, EXERCISING SHOES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | FLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |