USPTO serial 75474059
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE R BROWN
2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 408ARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hand, body and facial creams; hand, body and facial soaps; liquid foundation, compact face powder, face concealer, eye liner, lip liner, lipstick, nail polish, blush, eyelash mascara, eyebrow make-up, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair spray, hair styling gel, tooth paste, mouth wash, deodorant, shaving gel, after shave gel, skin contouring gel and cream, body powder, skin cleansing cream, cleansing facial cream, facial detergent for cosmetic purposes, laundry detergent, dish washer detergent, floor cleaning preparations, bathroom cleaning preparations, fabric softener, degreasing preparation for use on furniture, carpet and upholstery shampoo, and glass and window cleaning preparations, all sold for retail distribution as consumer products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |