Drawing for ADVOCATING EFFECTIVE SAFETY STANDARDS TO PROTECT AIRLINE TRAVELERS

USPTO serial 75474105

ADVOCATING EFFECTIVE SAFETY STANDARDS TO PROTECT AIRLINE TRAVELERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2347793Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2000
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ADVOCATING EFFECTIVE SAFETY STANDARDS TO PROTECT AIRLINE TRAVELERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROGER S THOMPSON

ROGER S THOMPSON GURSKY & EDERER, PC21 E 40TH STNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT AIRLINE SAFETY THROUGH SEMINARS, PERSONAL MEETINGS, SPEECHES, PRESENTATIONS AND CONFERENCES, AND DISTRIBUTING INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITHSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 24, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2007C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 4, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 2, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 1, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance