USPTO serial 75474160
QWIKLASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QWIKLASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A MUNCK
WILLIAM A MUNCK DNOVAKOV DAVIS & MUNCH, PC900 THREE GALLERIA TWR 13155 NOEL ROADALLAS, TX 75240Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC BUSINESS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PHOTOCOPIERS, FAX MACHINES, OPTICAL SCANNERS, LASER PRINTERS, AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES; AND PHOTOCOPIERS, FAX MACHINES, OPTICAL SCANNERS, LASER PRINTERS, AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES THAT, IN ADDITION TO THEIR PRIMARY FUNCTION, PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURE - PHOTOCOPYING, FAXING, OPTICAL SCANNING, PRINTING, AND SENDING DATA OVER A WIRELESS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |