USPTO serial 75474521
PERFORMANCE FOCUSSED HYDROPROCESSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMANCE FOCUSSED HYDROPROCESSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES P LAPOLLA
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CATALYSTS FOR THE REMOVAL OF CONTAMINANTS FROM FEEDSTOCKS IN OIL REFINERIES AND CHEMICAL/PETROLEUM PROCESSING OPERATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE REMOVAL OF CONTAMINANTS FROM FEEDSTOCKS IN OIL REFINERIES AND CHEMICAL/PETROLEUM PROCESSING OPERATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HALDOR TOPSOE A/S
- Other trademarks owned by HALDOR TOPSOE A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE FOCUSSED HYDROPROCESSING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |