USPTO serial 75475017
QUICK GETAWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICK GETAWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
ELIZABETH C DISKIN LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900180 N STETSONCHICAGO, IL 60601-6780Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, TRAVEL BOOKING SERVICES, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TRANSPORTATION | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |