Drawing for L.O.V.E. FOODS: LIVING, ORGANIC, VEGAN AND ENZYMATIC

USPTO serial 75475105

L.O.V.E. FOODS: LIVING, ORGANIC, VEGAN AND ENZYMATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARD, JENNIFER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L.O.V.E. FOODS: LIVING, ORGANIC, VEGAN AND ENZYMATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER W BECKER

PETER W BECKER REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN NORRIS ET ALP O BOX 92900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Enzymatically-active vegetarian foods derived from organically grown fruits, vegetables, grasses, sprouts and seeds, namely, processed fruits, processed vegetables, processed grasses for human consumption, processed edible bean and vegetable sprouts and processed edible seedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 29, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 25, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 30, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance