USPTO serial 75475134
LIFE IN PROVENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFE IN PROVENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHIRLEY J SU
ALISON NINIOAPT 403200 S CATALINA AVEREDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-3331Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Life in Provence, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Life in Provence, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LIFE IN PROVENCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |