CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MAGICLOTH

USPTO serial 75475342

MAGICLOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2751551Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2003
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MAGICLOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Bennett Ford

R. Bennett Ford ROY KIESEL FORD DOODY & THURMON9100 Bluebonnet Centre Blvd., Suite 100Baton Rouge, LA 70809UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Absorbent cloth for a variety of applications in the nature of cleaning, polishing and absorbing liquidSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 29, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2024CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 14, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 14, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 22, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2009815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 20, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 1998AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 7, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance