Drawing for OTX

USPTO serial 75476772

OTX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OTX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLELR

SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, ET ALONE FOUNTAIN SQ11911 FREEDOM DR STE 400RESTON, VA 20190

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGEMENT, WORD PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF FORMS, DATA, IMAGES, GRAPHICS AND PICTURES IN THE FIELD OF REAL ESTATE AND FINANCEACTIVE—
036FINANCIAL AND REAL ESTATE INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF FORMS, DATA, IMAGES, GRAPHICS, AND PICTURES PROVIDED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATAACTIVE—
037COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATION AND REPAIR FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
042MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF A WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 31, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance