USPTO serial 75476974
Serial No. 75476974
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2003
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75476974?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN T PETRICH
DELBERT J BARNARD Seed IP Law Group PLLC701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AUTOMOTIVE COOLING SYSTEM LEAK SEALANTS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR FUEL TREATMENT, CHEMICAL MOTOR OIL ADDITIVES, COOLANTS FOR VEHICLE ENGINES, RADIATOR FLUSH, DETERGENT ADDITIVES FOR USE WITH MOTOR OIL, AUTOMOBILE COOLING SYSTEM RUST INHIBITORS, CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS, NAMELY, AUTOMATIC FUEL ENHANCING COMPOSITION FOR HYDROCARBON BASED FUELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1997 |
| 003 | CARBURETOR AND AUTOMATIC CHOKE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, AUTOMOTIVE FUEL INJECTOR NOZZLE CLEANING PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1997 |
| 004 | AUTOMOTIVE LUBRICANTS, AUTOMOTIVE GREASES, NON-CHEMICAL MOTOR OIL ADDITIVES, MOTOR OIL, MODIFIED MOTOR OIL, NAMELY, FOR USE IN VEHICLE MOTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |