USPTO serial 75477008
DETECTS AND REJECTS DEFECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DETECTS AND REJECTS DEFECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS A MIRO
DOUGLAS A MIRO OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | On-line monitoring and diagnostic system comprised of cameras, microprocessors, sensors, and calibrated scales and utilized in the process of bottling and packaging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Auto-Mate Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AUTO-KAPS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Auto-Mate Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DETECTS AND REJECTS DEFECTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |