USPTO serial 75477098
JAVA FROST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JAVA FROST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICK A NICHOLS JR
NICK A NICHOLS JR NICK A NICHOLS JR PCP O BOX 16399SUGAR LAND, TX 77496-6399UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee-based beverage | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |