Drawing for MICROFUEL CELL

USPTO serial 75477259

MICROFUEL CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROFUEL CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES C WRAY

1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RDMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FUEL CELLS AND FUEL CELL TANKS FOR PRODUCING ELECTRICAL ENERGY; FUEL CELL CHEMICAL FUEL PROVIDED AS A UNIT WITH THE FOREGOINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 11, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance