Drawing for Serial No. 75477402

USPTO serial 75477402

Serial No. 75477402

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75477402?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS E SCHATZEL

THOMAS E SCHATZEL LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS E SCHATZEL16400 LARK AVE STE 240LOS GATOS, CA 95032-2547UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Epoxy glue for general bonding and repair purposes, for bonding metal, rubber, plastics, ceramics, fingernails and jewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 25, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance