Drawing for STREAMLINE

USPTO serial 75477483

STREAMLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STREAMLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT V. VICKERS

ROBERT V VICKERS FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE 7TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028FISHING TACKLEACTIVEMay 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2004ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 28, 2002EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 27, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 20, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 21, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 3, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 2, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance