USPTO serial 75477602
NOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURIE FEIGENBAUM
LAURIE FEIGENBAUM CALLAWAY & KIRK COMPANY LLC61 BOUNTY LNJERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely action figures; action figures and accessories therefore; mechanical action toys; action toys; amusement park rides; stuffed toys animals; baby multiple activity toys; baby rattles; balloons; toy banks; bath toys; bathtub toys; toy building blocks; board games; music box toys; toy boxes; cases for play accessories; cases for toy structures; promotional game materials; Christmas tree decorations; Christmas tree ornaments; action figure or play figure clothing; costume masks; crib mobiles; toy mobiles; infant action crib toys; dolls; bean bag dolls; paper dolls; porcelain dolls; rag dolls; soft sculpture dolls; dolls and accessories therefore; dolls and playsets therefore; electric action toys; electronic game equipment with a watch function; hand held unit for playing electronic games; paper face masks; party favors in the nature of crackers and noisemakers; toy noise makers; party favors in the nature of small toys; play figures; role playing game equipment in the nature of game book manuals; action skill games; card games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; hand held unit for playing video games; manipulative games; manipulative puzzles; jigsaw puzzles; three-dimensional cube-type puzzles; kites; costume masks; paper face masks; mechanical action toys; musical toys; playsets for dolls; plush toys; soft sculpture plush toys; porcelain dolls; marionette puppets; infant's rattles; ride-on toys; inflatable ride-on toys; stuffed toys; inflatable bath toys; squeezable squeaking toys; wind-up walking toys; wind-up toys; yo-yo's | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |